For awhile now, I've been writing about how Basketball is the most individual of all the team sports, and the only one that must be fully played with one's own personality. A player cannot exactly copy another's style. One of the best examples of this in the entire realm is Sam Young's Pump Fake, known in my inner circle as "The Grizzle Fake," after his exclamation of, "In your grizzle..." during a pickup game.
The pump fake, like the in-and-out dribble and jab step, will always have a somewhat good chance of success because it's based on deception. It's a fundamental move that's taught by purists in Midwestern gyms. But because of the uniqueness of the basketball player, Young's fake reigns supreme. Opposing coaches drum into their forwards' heads that its coming. Rick Pitino has even included it in his scouting report. Yet two or three times a game, Sam raises up on his toes and the ball is above his forehead; and defenders lose all principles and go flying.
But I wonder if those so-called purists—the ones that frown on the crossover and place religious solace in the two-handed bounce pass—detest The Grizzle Fake. If so, then this is the disconnect between what they want Basketball to be, and it fundamental nature. Do they despise it the way that the alley-oop was once dismissed as showboating? Is it "too unique" for them? Are they upset that even something so educated as the pump fake can be mixed with a person's being and be made their own? That move can only be a part of Sam's formula on Basketball. Anyone who attempts to xerox that move won't get the desired results. You won't be up on your toes enough, you'll be too quick with the fake, your hand placement won't be exactly like the release on your jumper. Bluntly put, it won't be the same. It'll be just another shot fake that may or may not work depending on your real jumper's success rate. Sam's move is Sam's move from now 'til basketball infinity.
Peace.
Stephen Curry is fake. First off, he looks no older than thirteen. His Davidson jersey looks like his father, Dell, gave it to him ot wear during lifting weights—and he never made it to the gym. But, for reasons I can't fathom, he's able to dominate college basketball in a way that hasn't been seen since
Curry is the epitome of having no consciense.
Another reason why Curry's dominance is almost unprecedented is because he goes to Davidson. Quick test: name all of the basketball schools in the state of North Carolina. How long did it take you to get to Davidson? Six, seven teams? Anyway, the point is that Davidson isn't exactly a recruiting giant in college basketball; so their talent is nowhere near the powerhouse schools like UCLA and Kansas. Even Gonzaga looks down on the players that go to Davidson. Moreover, do you know who
I stand by my bold statement that Curry, given his disadvantages of size and surrounding team talent, is the most dominant player since Pistol Pete. Another question: When he releases the ball, do you find yourself saying, "good," before it gets to the rim? I know I do. I'm not going to talk about NBA potential. Let's just enjoy him in the college game and worry about his pro measurables when he's actually in the draft. And with that said, you would think that the big time schools would've learned their lesson and snapped up the next Curry. 